Second Transmission

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: : Second Transmission]]
From: Michelle_Oldroyd@utd.uscourts.gov
Date: Tue, February 08, 2011 1:53 pm
To: <lre@icw.com>

Again, I think that if we need to distribute a mass email we can, to
establish the count. I would like to direct teachers/teams as I stated
before that they should count on their exhibit, agree as a team how to
approach their questioning, and work that into the foundation that they lay
to admit the online messages.




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Michelle M. Oldroyd
ADR Administrator & Staff Attorney
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Frank E. Moss U.S. Courthouse
350 South Main Street, Suite 150
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-2180
Phone (801) 524-6128
Fax (801) 526-1150
Email michelle_oldroyd@utd.uscourts.gov

This email (and any attachments) may contain confidential and privileged
material which is sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete
all copies of this message. Thank you.




My students and I have been reviewing the case and have a question as to
what the second transmission is. It states that Cris Robertson was with
Pat Clifford at the time that the second transmission was sent, but it
never clearly details what the second transmission is. Is it the personal
email? The second chat log? The post after the 25 minute lapse? Or is it
completely up to each teams discretion and interpretation to decide what
the second transmission is?

Any information you could give me about this would be greatly
appreciated.

Thank you for your time and help,

M